Positive Identification Trumps Alibi in Robbery with Homicide Cases

G.R. No. 102078, May 15, 1996

Imagine the terror of a home invasion, the loss of loved ones, and the daunting pursuit of justice. The case of People v. Feliciano illustrates the critical role of eyewitness testimony, the pitfalls of alibi defenses, and the application of aggravating circumstances in robbery with homicide cases. This case underscores the importance of positive identification in securing a conviction, even when the defense presents an alibi.

Legal Context: Robbery with Homicide

Robbery with homicide, as defined under Article 294 of the Revised Penal Code, is a complex crime where robbery is accompanied by homicide. The term ‘homicide’ here is used in its generic sense, encompassing murder and other forms of killing. This means that even if the intent to kill was not the primary motive, the resulting death during the robbery makes it a single, indivisible offense with a specific penalty. The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the robbery occurred and that a death resulted from or on the occasion of the robbery.

Article 294 of the Revised Penal Code states:

“Any person guilty of robbery with the use of violence against or intimidation of any person shall suffer:

1. The penalty of reclusion perpetua to death, when by reason or on occasion of the robbery, the crime of homicide shall have been committed.”

An alibi, on the other hand, is a defense asserting that the accused was elsewhere when the crime was committed. For an alibi to hold weight, it must be proven that it was physically impossible for the accused to be at the crime scene. Mere assertions are insufficient; corroborating evidence is essential to support the alibi.

Case Breakdown: The Fateful Day at Rosario Fariñas’ Home

On May 30, 1988, Rolando Feliciano and two others entered the home of Rosario Fariñas under the guise of waiting for her son-in-law. What began as a seemingly ordinary visit quickly turned violent. The intruders, armed with knives and guns, announced a robbery. Rosario Fariñas was fatally stabbed, and Marciano Fariñas was robbed and seriously injured.

Here’s a breakdown of the key events:

• The Arrival: Rolando Feliciano and his companions entered the Fariñas residence.
• The Attack: Rolando Feliciano stabbed Rosario Fariñas, while others held Marciano Fariñas and a young helper, Nelia Basilio, at bay.
• The Robbery: The perpetrators stole cash and U.S. dollars from the victims.
• The Escape: After stabbing Marciano Fariñas, the robbers fled the scene.

The trial hinged on the eyewitness testimony of Nelia Basilio, who initially failed to name Rolando Feliciano in her first affidavit but later positively identified him in court. The defense presented an alibi, claiming Rolando Feliciano was elsewhere at the time of the crime. However, the court found the alibi unconvincing due to inconsistencies in the defense witnesses’ testimonies.

The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of Nelia Basilio’s testimony, stating:

“From the aforequoted transcript of Nelia Basilio’s testimony, appellant Rolando Feliciano’s complicity in the crime as Rosario Fariñas’ attacker and one of the three robbers who held them up on May 30, 1988, is clearly established.”

The Court also addressed the alibi defense:

“More importantly, with the positive identification of appellant Rolando Feliciano, his alibi must necessarily fail.”

Practical Implications: Lessons for Homeowners and the Justice System

This case highlights several critical points:

• Positive Identification: A clear and unwavering identification by an eyewitness is powerful evidence.
• Alibi Defense: An alibi must be airtight and corroborated to be effective. Inconsistencies can undermine its credibility.
• Aggravating Circumstances: The commission of a crime in the victim’s dwelling can increase the severity of the sentence.

For homeowners, this case underscores the importance of home security and vigilance. Being aware of your surroundings and taking precautions can help prevent such tragedies. For the justice system, it reinforces the need for thorough investigations and careful evaluation of witness testimonies and alibi defenses.

Key Lessons

• Ensure your home is secure with adequate locks and security systems.
• Be cautious about who you let into your home.
• If you witness a crime, provide a detailed and accurate account to law enforcement.
• If accused of a crime, gather substantial and credible evidence to support your alibi.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is robbery with homicide?

A: Robbery with homicide is a special complex crime where robbery is committed, and on the occasion or by reason of such robbery, homicide (killing) also occurs. It is punished under Article 294 of the Revised Penal Code.

Q: What is an alibi, and how can it be used as a defense?

A: An alibi is a defense that the accused was somewhere else when the crime was committed, making it impossible for them to be the perpetrator. To be credible, an alibi must be supported by strong, corroborating evidence that proves the accused could not have been at the crime scene.

Q: What does “positive identification” mean in a court of law?

A: Positive identification means that a witness clearly and unequivocally identifies the accused as the person who committed the crime. This identification must be credible and free from doubt.

Q: What are aggravating circumstances, and how do they affect a sentence?

A: Aggravating circumstances are factors that increase the severity of a crime. In this case, the fact that the crime was committed in the victim’s dwelling was considered an aggravating circumstance, potentially leading to a harsher sentence.

Q: How does the failure to mention a suspect’s name in an initial affidavit affect a case?

A: While it can raise questions, the failure to mention a suspect’s name in an initial affidavit is not necessarily fatal to the case. If the witness later positively identifies the suspect in court and provides a credible explanation for the initial omission, the identification can still be valid.

Q: Is it possible for a person to be convicted of a crime even if there is no clear motive?

A: Yes, a person can be convicted of a crime even without a clear motive. The prosecution must prove that the accused committed the act, regardless of their reasons for doing so.

Q: What is the penalty for robbery with homicide in the Philippines?

A: Under Article 294 of the Revised Penal Code, the penalty for robbery with homicide is reclusion perpetua to death. However, with the abolition of the death penalty, the penalty is effectively reclusion perpetua.

ASG Law specializes in criminal law. Contact us or email hello@asglawpartners.com to schedule a consultation.