Repeated Rehiring Can Convert Project Employee to Regular Employee

G.R. No. 184362, November 15, 2010

Imagine a construction worker, hired for a specific project, year after year, project after project. Does he remain a ‘project employee’ indefinitely, or does he eventually gain the security of tenure afforded to regular employees? This case explores that critical distinction, highlighting how continuous rehiring can transform a project-based employee into a regular one under Philippine labor law. The central question is whether Virgilio Magallanes, initially hired for a specific construction project, attained regular employee status due to the duration and nature of his employment with Millennium Erectors Corporation.

Understanding Project vs. Regular Employment

Philippine labor law distinguishes between project employees and regular employees. A project employee is hired for a specific undertaking, with their employment tied to the project’s completion. Their services are coterminous with the project. In contrast, a regular employee performs tasks that are usually necessary or desirable in the employer’s business and enjoys security of tenure.

The Labor Code of the Philippines does not explicitly define “project employee,” but jurisprudence has established clear criteria. As the Supreme Court has stated, a project employee is one whose “employment has been fixed for a specific project or undertaking, the completion or termination of which has been determined at the time of the engagement of the employee or where the work or service to be performed is seasonal in nature and the employment is for the duration of the season.”

The key difference lies in the security of tenure. Regular employees can only be terminated for just or authorized causes, following due process. Project employees, however, can be terminated upon project completion.

The Case of Virgilio Magallanes

Virgilio Magallanes began working for Laurencito Tiu, CEO of Millennium Erectors Corporation (MEC), in 1988. Initially, he was a utility man, assigned to various construction projects. In 2004, he was told to stop reporting for work, allegedly due to his age. Magallanes then filed an illegal dismissal complaint.

MEC argued that Magallanes was a project employee, hired for a specific building project in Libis in 2003, presenting an employment contract and a termination report filed with the DOLE. They also provided evidence of financial assistance given to Magallanes, along with a quitclaim and waiver.

Magallanes countered that he had been employed since 1988, long before MEC’s incorporation in 2000. He claimed his continuous service had transformed him into a regular employee.

• Labor Arbiter (LA): Ruled in favor of MEC, finding Magallanes was a project employee aware of his employment’s nature.
• National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC): Reversed the LA’s decision, holding Magallanes was a regular employee due to the lack of a specific end date in his contract and payrolls showing employment dating back to 2001.
• Court of Appeals (CA): Affirmed the NLRC’s ruling, siding with Magallanes.

The Supreme Court upheld the CA’s decision. The Court emphasized that repeated rehiring could convert project employment into regular employment. “Petitioner’s various payrolls dating as early as 2001 show that respondent had been employed by it… these documents, rather than sustaining petitioner’s argument, only serve to support respondent’s contention that he had been employed in various projects, if not for 16 years, at the very least two years prior to his dismissal.”

Implications for Employers and Employees

This case underscores the importance of clearly defining the terms of employment, especially for project-based work. Employers must ensure contracts specify project duration and scope. Continuous rehiring without a clear break in service can lead to unintended consequences, transforming project employees into regular employees with security of tenure.

For employees, this case highlights the potential for achieving regular status through continuous service, even if initially hired for specific projects. It reinforces the principle that labor laws are designed to protect workers and ensure fair treatment.

Key Lessons:

• Clear Contracts: Employers must draft employment contracts that explicitly define the project’s scope and duration.
• Avoid Continuous Rehiring: If continuous rehiring is necessary, consider regularization to avoid legal complications.
• Document Everything: Maintain accurate records of employment contracts, project assignments, and termination reports.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the main difference between a project employee and a regular employee?

A: A project employee’s employment is tied to a specific project, while a regular employee performs tasks necessary for the employer’s business and has security of tenure.

Q: Can a project employee become a regular employee?

A: Yes, through continuous rehiring and performing tasks essential to the employer’s business, a project employee can attain regular status.

Q: What should an employment contract for a project employee include?

A: The contract should clearly define the project’s scope, duration, and the employee’s specific tasks.

Q: What happens if an employer doesn’t specify the project’s end date in the contract?

A: The employee may be considered a regular employee, especially if they perform continuous service.

Q: What should I do if I believe I have been illegally dismissed?

A: Consult with a labor lawyer to assess your rights and options, including filing a complaint with the NLRC.

Q: What is security of tenure?

A: Security of tenure means that a regular employee can only be terminated for just or authorized causes, following due process.

ASG Law specializes in Labor Law. Contact us or email hello@asglawpartners.com to schedule a consultation.