Contract to Sell vs. Contract of Sale: Why It Matters

TLDR: This case clarifies the crucial distinction between a contract to sell and a contract of sale in Philippine property law. Failing to understand this difference can lead to significant legal and financial consequences, especially in real estate transactions. The key lies in when ownership transfers – immediately upon agreement in a sale, or upon full payment in a contract to sell.

G.R. NO. 145470, December 09, 2005

Introduction

Imagine investing in a property, only to discover later that you don’t actually own it yet, even after years of occupancy. This scenario highlights the importance of understanding the nuances of property law, particularly the difference between a contract to sell and a contract of sale. This distinction significantly impacts your rights and obligations as a buyer or seller.

In the case of Sps. Luis V. Cruz and Aida Cruz vs. Sps. Alejandro Fernando, Sr., and Rita Fernando, the Supreme Court tackled this very issue. The dispute centered on a property in Bulacan and whether a prior agreement constituted a valid contract of sale or merely a contract to sell, ultimately determining who had the right to possess the land.

Legal Context

Philippine law recognizes two primary types of agreements for transferring property: a contract of sale and a contract to sell. The critical difference lies in the transfer of ownership. In a contract of sale, ownership passes to the buyer upon delivery of the thing sold. In contrast, a contract to sell reserves ownership with the seller until the buyer has fully paid the purchase price. This distinction is crucial because it affects the rights and remedies available to each party.

Article 1458 of the Civil Code defines a contract of sale: “By the contract of sale one of the contracting parties obligates himself to transfer the ownership and to deliver a determinate thing, and the other to pay therefor a price certain in money or its equivalent.”

Article 1475 further states: “The contract of sale is perfected at the moment there is a meeting of minds upon the thing which is the object of the contract and upon the price. From that moment, the parties may reciprocally demand performance, subject to the provisions of the law governing the form of contracts.”

Key concepts to remember:

• Contract of Sale: Ownership transfers upon delivery.
• Contract to Sell: Ownership transfers upon full payment of the purchase price.
• Accion Publiciana: An action for recovery of the right to possess, filed when dispossession has lasted longer than one year but is within ten years.

Case Breakdown

The Cruz spouses occupied a portion of a property owned by the Fernando spouses. The Fernandos had purchased the property from the Glorioso spouses, who had previously entered into an agreement (Kasunduan) with the Cruzes regarding a portion of the land. The Fernandos, asserting their ownership, filed an accion publiciana to evict the Cruzes.

The Cruzes argued that the Kasunduan with the Gloriosos was a perfected contract of sale, giving them the right to the property. They claimed the agreement was partially consummated. The RTC ruled in favor of the Fernandos, and the CA affirmed this decision, construing the Kasunduan as a mere contract to sell.

The Supreme Court upheld the CA’s decision, emphasizing the importance of a clear agreement on the terms of payment in a contract of sale. The Court highlighted several key aspects of the Kasunduan that indicated it was a contract to sell:

“The foregoing terms and conditions show that it is a contract to sell and not a contract of sale. For one, the conspicuous absence of a definite manner of payment of the purchase price in the agreement confirms the conclusion that it is a contract to sell.”

“Another significant provision is that which reads: ‘Na ang ipinagsusumbong ay tiyakang ililipat ang bahay sa bahaging kanilang nabili o mabibili sa buwan ng Enero 31, 1984.’ The foregoing indicates that a contract of sale is yet to be consummated and ownership of the property remained in the Gloriosos. Otherwise, why would the alternative term ‘mabibili’ be used if indeed the property had already been sold to petitioners.”

The Court also noted that the Cruzes’ failure to relocate their house to the rear portion of the property, as stipulated in the Kasunduan, further supported the conclusion that the agreement was never fully executed.

Key procedural points:

• RTC ruled in favor of the Fernando spouses.
• CA affirmed the RTC decision.
• The Supreme Court upheld the CA’s ruling, emphasizing the importance of intent and conditions in determining the nature of the contract.

Practical Implications

This case underscores the importance of clearly defining the terms of property agreements. Whether you are a buyer or seller, understanding the difference between a contract to sell and a contract of sale is crucial to protect your rights. A poorly drafted agreement can lead to costly litigation and the loss of property.

Key Lessons:

• Specify Payment Terms: Always include a clear and definite agreement on the manner of payment of the purchase price.
• Document Intent: Ensure that the language of the agreement accurately reflects the parties’ intentions regarding the transfer of ownership.
• Fulfill Conditions: Comply with all conditions stipulated in the agreement to ensure its validity and enforceability.
• Seek Legal Advice: Consult with a real estate attorney to review and draft property agreements to avoid potential disputes.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the main difference between a contract to sell and a contract of sale?

A: In a contract of sale, ownership transfers to the buyer upon delivery. In a contract to sell, ownership remains with the seller until the buyer fully pays the purchase price.

Q: What happens if the buyer fails to pay the full purchase price in a contract to sell?

A: The seller retains ownership of the property, and the buyer does not have the right to demand the transfer of title.

Q: Can a contract to sell be converted into a contract of sale?

A: Yes, upon full payment of the purchase price and fulfillment of any other conditions stipulated in the agreement.

Q: What is an accion publiciana?

A: It’s an action to recover the right of possession of a property when the dispossession has lasted longer than one year but is within ten years.

Q: Why is it important to have a written agreement for property transactions?

A: A written agreement provides clear evidence of the parties’ intentions and the terms of the transaction, reducing the risk of disputes and misunderstandings.

Q: What should I do if I am unsure whether my agreement is a contract to sell or a contract of sale?

A: Consult with a qualified real estate attorney to review the agreement and advise you on your rights and obligations.

ASG Law specializes in Real Estate Law. Contact us or email hello@asglawpartners.com to schedule a consultation.