When is Seeking NBI Assistance Considered Forum Shopping? A Crucial Distinction

TLDR: This case clarifies that seeking investigative assistance from the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) does not automatically constitute forum shopping in the Philippines. The NBI’s role is purely investigatory, lacking judicial or quasi-judicial power to grant remedies. Therefore, requesting NBI assistance while pursuing related court cases does not violate the rules against forum shopping.

A.C. No. 4634, September 24, 1997

INTRODUCTION

Imagine a scenario where you believe you’ve been defrauded. You file a civil case to recover your losses, but you also want the perpetrators brought to justice. Can you simultaneously seek the help of law enforcement to investigate potential criminal charges, or will this be seen as improperly pursuing the same issue in multiple forums? This question lies at the heart of the Supreme Court decision in Jesus Cabarrus, Jr. vs. Jose Antonio Bernas, which provides important guidance on the limits of forum shopping in the Philippines.

In this case, Jesus Cabarrus, Jr. filed a disbarment complaint against Atty. Jose Antonio Bernas, alleging that Bernas had engaged in forum shopping by instigating a criminal complaint with the NBI while simultaneously pursuing a civil case on behalf of his client, Ramon B. Pascual, Jr. The core issue before the Supreme Court was whether Atty. Bernas’s actions violated the rules against forum shopping.

LEGAL CONTEXT: UNDERSTANDING FORUM SHOPPING AND THE NBI’S ROLE

Forum shopping is the practice of filing multiple suits involving the same parties and causes of action in different courts or tribunals, hoping to obtain a favorable ruling in one of them. Philippine courts strictly prohibit forum shopping to prevent abuse of the judicial process and ensure orderly administration of justice. Circular No. 28-91, Revised Circular No. 28-91, and Administrative Circular No. 04-94 are the key regulations governing forum shopping.

The Supreme Court has defined forum shopping as “an act of a litigant who repetitively availed himself of several judicial remedies in different fora, simultaneously or successively, all substantially founded on the same transactions and the same essential facts and circumstances, and all raising substantially the same issues either pending in, or already resolved adversely by, some other court.”

However, it’s crucial to understand the functions of the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI). Act No. 157, Section 1, outlines the NBI’s functions, which are primarily investigatory and informational:

Section 1. There is hereby created a Bureau of Investigation under the Department of Justice which shall have the following functions:

(a) To undertake investigation of crimes and other offenses against the laws of the Philippines, upon its initiative and as public interest may require;

(b) To render assistance, whenever properly requested in the investigation or detection of crimes and other offenses;

The NBI lacks judicial or quasi-judicial powers; it cannot make binding orders or judgments. Its role is to investigate and gather evidence, which may then be used by prosecutors to determine whether to file criminal charges.

CASE BREAKDOWN: THE FACTS AND THE COURT’S REASONING

The case unfolded as follows:

• Ramon Pascual, Jr., represented by Atty. Bernas, filed a civil case for reconveyance of property and damages, alleging fraud and forgery.
• Prior to filing the civil case, Pascual, through Atty. Bernas, requested the NBI to investigate the alleged forgery.
• Cabarrus argued that this request to the NBI, coupled with the civil case, constituted forum shopping.

The Supreme Court disagreed, emphasizing the NBI’s limited role. The Court stated:

“Explicitly, the function of the National Bureau of Investigations are merely investigatory and informational in nature. It has no judicial or quasi-judicial powers and is incapable of granting any relief to a party. It cannot even determine probable cause. It is an investigative agency whose findings are merely recommendatory.”

The Court further clarified that the circulars prohibiting forum shopping refer to:

“those vested with judicial powers or quasi-judicial powers and those who not only hear and determine controversies between adverse parties, but to make binding orders or judgments.”

Because the NBI does not possess such powers, seeking its assistance does not constitute forum shopping. The Court dismissed the disbarment complaint against Atty. Bernas.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: WHAT THIS MEANS FOR YOU

This case provides crucial clarification for individuals and businesses considering seeking NBI assistance while also pursuing related court cases. It confirms that simply requesting the NBI to investigate a potential crime does not automatically equate to forum shopping.

However, it’s essential to ensure that the actions taken before the NBI are genuinely limited to seeking investigation and do not involve actively seeking a favorable judgment or remedy from the NBI itself. Overstepping this boundary could still be construed as forum shopping.

Key Lessons:

• NBI Investigations are Not Forum Shopping: Requesting NBI assistance is not forum shopping because the NBI lacks judicial power.
• Focus on Investigation: Ensure your interactions with the NBI are solely for investigative purposes.
• Avoid Seeking Remedies from NBI: Do not attempt to obtain a judgment or specific remedy directly from the NBI.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Q: What exactly constitutes forum shopping?

A: Forum shopping is filing multiple cases involving the same parties, issues, and causes of action in different courts or tribunals to increase the chances of a favorable outcome.

Q: Does filing a criminal case and a civil case simultaneously constitute forum shopping?

A: Not necessarily. A civil case can be filed independently of a criminal case without violating forum shopping rules, as long as they don’t involve seeking the same relief based on the same cause of action from different courts simultaneously.

Q: Can I seek assistance from the NBI while my case is pending in court?

A: Yes, seeking investigative assistance from the NBI is generally permissible as the NBI’s function is investigatory, not judicial.

Q: What if the NBI investigation leads to a recommendation that affects my court case?

A: The NBI’s findings are merely recommendatory. The court will independently evaluate the evidence presented and make its own determination.

Q: What should I do if I’m unsure whether my actions might be considered forum shopping?

A: Consult with a qualified attorney to assess your specific situation and ensure compliance with the rules against forum shopping.

ASG Law specializes in criminal and civil litigation. Contact us or email hello@asglawpartners.com to schedule a consultation.