Regular vs. Project Employees: Security of Tenure in Philippine Construction

Determining Regular Employment Status: Continuous Rehiring and Security of Tenure

TLDR: This case clarifies the distinction between project and regular employees in the construction industry. Continuous rehiring for multiple projects can lead to regular employment status, granting security of tenure and protection against illegal dismissal, emphasizing the importance of consistent employment practices and compliance with labor laws.

G.R. No. 116781, September 05, 1997

Introduction

Imagine pouring years of your life into a company, only to be told your services are no longer needed because the “project” is complete. For many construction workers in the Philippines, this is a harsh reality. The line between ‘project employee’ and ‘regular employee’ can be blurry, leading to disputes over job security and benefits. This case of Tomas Lao Construction, et al. vs. National Labor Relations Commission, et al. sheds light on how repeated rehiring can transform project-based employment into regular employment, granting workers greater rights and protections.

In this case, a group of construction workers filed complaints for illegal dismissal against Tomas Lao Construction, LVM Construction Corporation, and Thomas and James Developers (Phil.), Inc. They argued that despite being initially hired for specific projects, their continuous rehiring over many years had made them regular employees, entitled to security of tenure.

Legal Context: Project vs. Regular Employment

The Labor Code of the Philippines distinguishes between project employees and regular employees. Project employees are hired for a specific project or undertaking, and their employment is coterminous with the completion of that project. Regular employees, on the other hand, perform functions that are necessary or desirable in the usual business of the employer and enjoy security of tenure.

Policy Instruction No. 20 of the Department of Labor defines project employees as those employed in connection with a particular construction project. However, the Supreme Court has consistently held that the repeated rehiring of project employees can transform their status into regular employees.

Article 280 of the Labor Code provides further clarification:

“An employee who is engaged to perform work which is usually necessary or desirable in the usual business or trade of the employer is deemed a regular employee for as long as the activities performed are usually necessary or desirable to the usual business or trade of the employer…”

The key is to determine whether the employee’s work is vital and indispensable to the employer’s business, and whether the employment is continuous and not tied to a specific project.

Case Breakdown: From Project-Based to Regular Employment

The private respondents in this case were construction workers who had been working for the “Lao Group of Companies” for several years, some for over a decade. They were hired for various construction projects undertaken by Tomas Lao Construction, LVM Construction Corporation, and Thomas and James Developers (Phil.), Inc.

Sometime in 1989, the company issued a memorandum requiring all workers to sign employment contract forms and clearances, retroactively dated to January 10, 1989. These contracts classified the workers as project employees with a definite period of employment. Most of the workers refused to sign, believing it was a scheme to downgrade their status. As a result, their salaries were withheld, and they were eventually terminated.

Here’s a breakdown of the case’s journey through the legal system:

NLRC RAB VIII (Tacloban City): Initially dismissed the complaints, ruling that the workers were project employees.

NLRC Fourth Division (Cebu City): Reversed the Labor Arbiter’s decision, finding that the workers were regular employees illegally dismissed.

Supreme Court: Affirmed the NLRC’s decision, emphasizing the impact of continuous rehiring on employment status.

The Supreme Court emphasized the significance of continuous rehiring. As the Court stated:

“While it may be allowed that in the instant case the workers were initially hired for specific projects or undertakings of the company and hence can be classified as project employees, the repeated re-hiring and the continuing need for their services over a long span of time… have undeniably made them regular employees.”

Furthermore, the Court noted:

“Clearly, the continuous rehiring of the same set of employees within the framework of the Lao Group of Companies is strongly indicative that private respondents were an integral part of a work pool from which petitioners drew its workers for its various projects.”

Practical Implications: Protecting Workers’ Rights

This ruling has significant implications for the construction industry and other sectors where project-based employment is common. Employers cannot simply classify workers as project employees indefinitely, especially when they are continuously rehired for multiple projects. The length of service and the nature of the work performed are crucial factors in determining employment status.

For employees, this case reinforces the importance of documenting their employment history, including the number of projects they have worked on and the duration of their service. This documentation can be crucial in proving regular employment status in case of disputes.

Key Lessons

Continuous Rehiring Matters: Repeatedly rehiring project employees can lead to regular employment status.

Substance Over Form: Courts will look beyond the label of “project employee” to the actual nature of the employment.

Documentation is Key: Employees should keep records of their employment history to support their claims.

Reportorial Requirements: Employers must submit termination reports to the DOLE for project employees; failure to do so can indicate regular employment.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the main difference between a project employee and a regular employee?

A: A project employee is hired for a specific project, and their employment ends when the project is completed. A regular employee performs tasks necessary for the employer’s usual business and has security of tenure.

Q: How does continuous rehiring affect an employee’s status?

A: Continuous rehiring for multiple projects can transform a project employee into a regular employee, granting them security of tenure and other benefits.

Q: What factors do courts consider when determining employment status?

A: Courts consider the length of service, the nature of the work performed, and whether the work is vital to the employer’s business.

Q: What should an employee do if they believe they have been illegally dismissed?

A: An employee who believes they have been illegally dismissed should file a complaint with the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC).

Q: What are the employer’s obligations when terminating a project employee?

A: Employers must submit a report of termination to the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) upon completion of the project.

Q: Can a company avoid regularizing employees by repeatedly assigning them to short-term projects?

A: No. The Supreme Court has consistently ruled against schemes designed to circumvent labor laws and deprive employees of their right to security of tenure.

Q: What is the significance of a

ASG Law