Backwages in Illegal Dismissal Cases: Salary Increases Are Not Always Included

When an employee is illegally dismissed in the Philippines, they are entitled to backwages. However, the computation of these backwages can be complex. This case clarifies that while backwages include allowances and other benefits, they do not automatically include prospective salary increases. The base figure is the wage rate at the time of dismissal, plus regular allowances.

EQUITABLE BANKING CORPORATION (NOW KNOWN AS EQUITABLE-PCI BANK), PETITIONER, VS. RICARDO SADAC, RESPONDENT. G.R. NO. 164772, June 08, 2006

Introduction

Imagine being wrongfully terminated from your job after years of dedicated service. You fight back, and the courts rule in your favor, awarding you backwages. But what exactly does that include? Is it just your old salary, or does it account for the raises you would have likely received? This is the question at the heart of Equitable Banking Corporation v. Ricardo Sadac, a case that delves into the specifics of backwage computation in illegal dismissal cases.

Ricardo Sadac, a former Vice President and General Counsel of Equitable Banking Corporation (now Equitable-PCI Bank), was terminated after a petition from other lawyers in his department expressing a lack of confidence in his leadership. He filed a complaint for illegal dismissal, and the Supreme Court ultimately ruled in his favor. The dispute then shifted to the amount of backwages Sadac was entitled to, specifically whether this included prospective salary increases, check-up benefits, clothing allowance, and cash conversion of vacation leave.

Legal Context: Backwages and Article 279 of the Labor Code

The foundation for backwages in the Philippines is found in Article 279 of the Labor Code, as amended by Republic Act No. 6715. This provision aims to protect employees from unjust termination and ensure they are adequately compensated if such termination occurs.

Article 279 states:

“An employee who is unjustly dismissed from work shall be entitled to reinstatement without loss of seniority rights and other privileges and to his full backwages, inclusive of allowances, and to his other benefits or their monetary equivalent computed from the time his compensation was withheld from him up to the time of his actual reinstatement.”

Key terms in this article include:

• Reinstatement: Returning the employee to their former position.
• Backwages: Compensation for the earnings the employee lost due to the illegal dismissal.
• Allowances: Additional payments beyond the basic salary, often for specific expenses.
• Other benefits: Non-wage compensation such as health insurance, leave credits, or retirement plans.

Previous jurisprudence has established that “full backwages” should be awarded without deducting earnings the employee may have derived from other employment during the period of dismissal. This principle was solidified in the landmark case of Bustamante v. National Labor Relations Commission.

Case Breakdown: The Fight for Fair Compensation

The story of Equitable Banking Corporation v. Ricardo Sadac is a testament to the complexities of labor disputes and the importance of understanding legal entitlements.

Here’s a breakdown of the case’s journey:

1. Initial Complaint: Sadac filed a complaint for illegal dismissal after being terminated by Equitable Banking Corporation.
2. Labor Arbiter’s Decision: The Labor Arbiter initially dismissed the complaint.
3. NLRC Reversal: The National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) reversed the Labor Arbiter’s decision, declaring Sadac’s dismissal illegal.
4. Supreme Court Confirmation: The Supreme Court affirmed the NLRC’s decision, solidifying the finding of illegal dismissal (Equitable Banking Corporation v. National Labor Relations Commission, 339 Phil. 541 (1997)).
5. Computation Dispute: The case returned to the Labor Arbiter for computation of backwages, leading to a dispute over what should be included in the calculation.
6. Labor Arbiter’s Order: The Labor Arbiter included general increases, check-up benefits, clothing allowance, and cash conversion of vacation leave in the backwages computation.
7. NLRC Reversal (Again): The NLRC reversed the Labor Arbiter’s order, excluding the additional items.
8. Court of Appeals Decision: The Court of Appeals sided with Sadac, reinstating the Labor Arbiter’s original order.
9. Supreme Court Review: The case reached the Supreme Court again, focusing on the specific components of backwages.

The Supreme Court ultimately disagreed with the Court of Appeals regarding the inclusion of prospective salary increases and certain benefits. The Court stated:

“Contrary to the ruling of the Court of Appeals, we do not see that a salary increase can be interpreted as either an allowance or a benefit. Salary increases are not akin to allowances or benefits, and cannot be confused with either.”

The Court further clarified its reasoning:

“To extend the coverage of an allowance or a benefit to include salary increases would be to strain both the imagination of the Court and the language of law.”

However, the Court upheld the award of attorney’s fees and the imposition of a 12% interest per annum on the outstanding balance.

Practical Implications: What This Means for Employers and Employees

This ruling provides clarity on what constitutes “full backwages” under Article 279 of the Labor Code. It establishes that while allowances and other benefits are included, prospective salary increases are not automatically part of the computation. This has significant implications for both employers and employees involved in illegal dismissal cases.

For employers, this case serves as a reminder to adhere to due process in termination proceedings to avoid costly illegal dismissal claims. It also clarifies the limits of backwage liability, providing a more predictable financial outcome in case of an unfavorable judgment.

For employees, this case highlights the importance of understanding their rights and entitlements upon termination. While prospective salary increases may not be guaranteed, employees are still entitled to backwages based on their salary at the time of dismissal, plus allowances and other benefits.

Key Lessons

• Backwages are based on the wage rate at the time of dismissal: This includes the basic salary, regular allowances, and other benefits the employee was receiving.
• Prospective salary increases are not guaranteed: Unless there is a specific legal decree or order mandating the increase, it is considered a mere expectancy.
• Document all benefits and allowances: Employees should keep records of all benefits and allowances they receive to support their claims in case of illegal dismissal.
• Seek legal advice: Both employers and employees should consult with legal professionals to understand their rights and obligations in termination proceedings.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q: What is the difference between salary and wage in the context of backwages?

A: In labor law, the terms “salary” and “wage” are often used interchangeably. The Supreme Court has affirmed that both refer to a reward or recompense for services performed.

Q: Are bonuses included in the computation of backwages?

A: Yes, bonuses that are considered regular or guaranteed benefits are typically included in the computation of backwages.

Q: What happens if the employer cannot reinstate the employee due to strained relations?

A: If reinstatement is not feasible, the employee is usually entitled to separation pay in addition to backwages.

Q: How is the 12% interest on backwages calculated?

A: The 12% interest per annum is calculated on the total monetary award (including backwages, allowances, and other benefits) from the date the judgment becomes final and executory until full payment is made.

Q: What evidence can an employee present to prove their entitlement to certain benefits?

A: Employees can present employment contracts, company policies, pay slips, and testimonies from other employees to prove their entitlement to benefits.

Q: What is the significance of Article 279 of the Labor Code?

A: Article 279 provides security of tenure to employees, protecting them from unjust dismissal and ensuring they receive fair compensation if illegally terminated.

Q: Does this ruling apply to all types of employees?

A: Yes, this ruling generally applies to all regular employees who are unjustly dismissed from work.

ASG Law specializes in labor law and employment disputes. Contact us or email hello@asglawpartners.com to schedule a consultation.