Key Takeaway: The Importance of Collective Bargaining Agreements in Seafarer Disability Claims

Torm Shipping Philippines, Inc., Torm S/A v. Pamfilo A. Alacre, G.R. No. 229228, January 26, 2021

Imagine a seafarer, miles away from home, suffering an injury that could change his life forever. For Pamfilo A. Alacre, this was not just a hypothetical scenario but a reality that led to a legal battle over disability benefits. The case of Torm Shipping Philippines, Inc., Torm S/A v. Pamfilo A. Alacre highlights the critical role that Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBAs) play in determining the rights of seafarers when it comes to disability claims. This case not only underscores the complexities of maritime employment but also sheds light on the interplay between local and foreign legal systems in resolving such disputes.

In this case, Pamfilo A. Alacre, a seafarer, sought permanent total disability benefits after suffering a shoulder injury while working on board a vessel. The central legal question revolved around the applicability of the CBA and how it should be interpreted in conjunction with the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration-Standard Employment Contract (POEA-SEC) and the Danish Industrial Injuries Act (DIIA).

Legal Context

The rights of seafarers regarding disability benefits are governed by a combination of medical findings, contractual agreements, and statutory provisions. In the Philippines, the POEA-SEC, which is part of Department Order No. 4, series of 2000, sets out the standard terms and conditions for overseas Filipino workers, including seafarers. Additionally, seafarers may be covered by CBAs that can provide more favorable terms than those stipulated in the POEA-SEC.

A key term to understand is “disability grading,” which refers to the assessment of a seafarer’s condition to determine the extent of their disability and the corresponding compensation. The POEA-SEC provides a schedule of disability gradings and their corresponding benefits, while CBAs may include provisions for offsetting benefits received from other sources, such as foreign compensation schemes like the DIIA.

The DIIA, for instance, provides for disability benefits and loss of earning capacity for workers in Denmark, including seafarers. The interplay between these different legal frameworks can significantly impact the outcome of disability claims. For example, the CBA in the Alacre case stipulated that any benefits received under the DIIA should be offset against those awarded under the POEA-SEC.

Case Breakdown

Pamfilo A. Alacre was employed as a Fitter on board the vessel Torm Kristina. In July 2012, he suffered a shoulder injury and was repatriated to the Philippines for medical treatment. Despite undergoing a series of treatments, his condition did not improve, leading him to seek a second opinion from another doctor, who recommended a higher disability grading.

Alacre filed a complaint for permanent total disability benefits before the Labor Arbiter (LA), who awarded him the maximum disability compensation under the POEA-SEC. However, the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) reversed this decision, citing the applicability of the CBA and the pending claim under the DIIA.

Alacre then appealed to the Court of Appeals (CA), which reinstated the LA’s decision. The CA held that the CBA remained effective and that the failure of the company-designated physician to issue a final assessment within the required period justified the award of permanent total disability benefits.

The case eventually reached the Supreme Court, which ruled in favor of Torm Shipping. The Court found that the CBA was still effective and that its provisions for offsetting benefits under the DIIA were applicable. The Court noted that Alacre had already received benefits from the Danish authorities that exceeded the maximum compensation under the POEA-SEC, rendering his claim moot.

Key quotes from the Supreme Court’s decision include:

“The CBA provides that any amount awarded under the Danish Industrial Injuries Act shall be subtracted from the compensation respondent is found to be entitled under the POEA-SEC. Any deficiency would be the amount payable to respondent.”

“With the offsetting provision under the CBA, whether the Court adjudge the respondent entitled to total and permanent liability under the POEA-SEC, the result would be the same, there is no additional obligation imposed upon petitioner.”

Practical Implications

This ruling has significant implications for seafarers and their employers. It underscores the importance of understanding and adhering to the terms of CBAs, particularly those involving offsetting provisions. Seafarers should be aware that benefits received from foreign jurisdictions may impact their claims under the POEA-SEC.

For employers, this case highlights the need to ensure that CBAs are properly communicated and understood by their employees. It also emphasizes the importance of timely and definitive medical assessments to avoid disputes over disability gradings.

Key Lessons:

• Seafarers should thoroughly review the terms of their CBAs, especially provisions related to disability benefits and offsetting.
• Employers must ensure that medical assessments are completed within the required timeframes to prevent disputes.
• Legal advice should be sought to navigate the complexities of overlapping legal frameworks in maritime employment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA)?
A CBA is a written legal contract between an employer and a union representing employees. It sets out the terms and conditions of employment, including provisions for disability benefits.

How does the POEA-SEC affect seafarer disability claims?
The POEA-SEC provides a standard framework for the rights and obligations of overseas Filipino workers, including seafarers. It includes a schedule of disability gradings and corresponding benefits.

What is the Danish Industrial Injuries Act (DIIA)?
The DIIA is a Danish law that provides compensation for workers, including seafarers, who suffer injuries or disabilities. It can impact seafarer claims under the POEA-SEC if offsetting provisions are in place.

Can a seafarer receive benefits from both the POEA-SEC and a foreign compensation scheme?
It depends on the terms of the CBA. Some CBAs include offsetting provisions, meaning benefits received from one source may reduce or eliminate benefits from another.

What should seafarers do if they suffer an injury while working abroad?
Seafarers should seek immediate medical attention, document their condition, and consult with legal experts to understand their rights under the POEA-SEC, their CBA, and any applicable foreign laws.

ASG Law specializes in maritime and labor law. Contact us or email hello@asglawpartners.com to schedule a consultation.