Importance of Timely Medical Assessments in Determining Seafarer Disability Benefits

Salonga v. Solvang Philippines, Inc., G.R. No. 229451, February 10, 2021

Imagine being a seafarer, miles away from home, working tirelessly on a vessel when suddenly, a debilitating injury strikes. The journey back to health is not just about physical recovery but also about securing the rightful compensation to support your livelihood. This scenario is not uncommon among seafarers, and the recent Supreme Court decision in Salonga v. Solvang Philippines, Inc. sheds light on the critical importance of timely medical assessments in determining disability benefits. The case revolves around Abner P. Salonga, a Chief Steward who suffered severe back and neck pain while on duty, leading to a dispute over his disability compensation.

Legal Context: Navigating the Waters of Seafarer Disability Claims

In the Philippines, the rights of seafarers are protected under the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration Standard Employment Contract (POEA-SEC). This contract outlines the obligations of employers and the entitlements of seafarers, particularly concerning disability benefits. The POEA-SEC mandates that the company-designated physician must issue a final medical assessment within 120 or 240 days from the seafarer’s repatriation, depending on the circumstances.

Key to understanding this case is the concept of total and permanent disability. According to the POEA-SEC, if the company-designated physician fails to issue a final assessment within the stipulated period, the seafarer’s condition is deemed total and permanent disability by operation of law. This principle was highlighted in the case of Elburg Shipmanagement Phils., Inc. v. Quiogue, where the Supreme Court established clear guidelines for such claims.

The POEA-SEC also introduces the third-doctor-referral provision, which comes into play when there is a conflict between the assessments of the company-designated physician and the seafarer’s doctor of choice. However, this provision is only applicable if a final assessment is issued within the required period.

Case Breakdown: The Voyage of Abner P. Salonga

Abner P. Salonga’s journey began when he was hired by Solvang Philippines, Inc. as a Chief Steward under a nine-month contract in April 2012. Shortly after joining the vessel MN Clipper Hebe, Salonga experienced severe back and neck pain while performing his duties. Despite his initial attempts to continue working, the pain worsened, leading to medical consultations in Indonesia and Thailand, where he was diagnosed with spondylosis and myofascial pain.

Upon repatriation in January 2013, Salonga sought further medical attention, but the company-designated physician, Dr. Chuasuan, failed to issue a final disability assessment within the 120-day period required by law. This delay was crucial, as the Supreme Court later ruled that the absence of a timely assessment rendered Salonga’s disability total and permanent by operation of law.

The procedural journey was complex. Initially, the Labor Arbiter awarded Salonga US$110,000 based on the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA). However, the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) reduced this to US$60,000, citing the CBA’s inapplicability due to its expiration before Salonga’s employment period. The Court of Appeals further reduced the award to US$22,020, based on the company-designated physician’s assessment, despite its tardiness.

The Supreme Court’s decision to reinstate the NLRC’s award of US$60,000 was grounded in the following key points:

• “Dr. Chuasuan’s failure to issue a final disability assessment on petitioner within the time frame required by law rendered petitioner’s disability permanent and total by operation of law.”
• “There is no evidence that a final medical assessment was issued on petitioner’s disability within the 120-day period.”
• “The third-doctor-referral provision does not find application at bar.”

Practical Implications: Charting the Course for Future Claims

This ruling underscores the importance of timely medical assessments in seafarer disability claims. Employers must ensure that their designated physicians adhere to the 120 or 240-day assessment period to avoid automatic classification of a seafarer’s condition as total and permanent disability.

For seafarers, this case serves as a reminder to diligently document their medical condition and treatment, especially upon repatriation. If the company-designated physician fails to issue a timely assessment, seafarers may be entitled to higher compensation under the POEA-SEC.

Key Lessons:

• Employers should ensure timely medical assessments to avoid higher compensation claims.
• Seafarers must document their medical condition and treatment meticulously.
• Understanding the legal provisions of the POEA-SEC can significantly impact disability claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is total and permanent disability for seafarers?

Total and permanent disability refers to a seafarer’s inability to work due to an injury or illness that persists beyond the assessment period mandated by the POEA-SEC.

How long does the company-designated physician have to issue a disability assessment?

The physician must issue a final medical assessment within 120 days from the seafarer’s repatriation, extendable to 240 days with justifiable reason.

What happens if the company-designated physician fails to issue an assessment within the required period?

The seafarer’s condition is deemed total and permanent disability by operation of law, entitling them to higher compensation.

Is the third-doctor-referral provision always applicable?

No, it only applies if there is a final assessment within the required period and a conflict between the company-designated physician and the seafarer’s doctor of choice.

Can a seafarer claim disability benefits under a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA)?

Yes, but only if the CBA is valid during the seafarer’s employment period.

ASG Law specializes in maritime and labor law. Contact us or email hello@asglawpartners.com to schedule a consultation.