Work-Related Heart Conditions: Understanding When a Job Can Cause a Heart Attack

Social Security System v. Belinda C. Cuento, G.R. No. 225827, July 28, 2021

Imagine a hardworking messenger, tirelessly navigating the bustling streets of Metro Manila, only to suffer a fatal heart attack while on duty. This scenario is not just a hypothetical; it’s the real-life tragedy that led to the landmark Supreme Court case of Social Security System v. Belinda C. Cuento. At the heart of this case is a critical question: Can the daily grind of a job be directly linked to a sudden and fatal heart attack? This case delves into the complexities of work-related health issues, specifically focusing on myocardial infarction, commonly known as a heart attack, and its compensability under the Employees’ Compensation Law in the Philippines.

The case centers around Maximo Cuento, a motorized messenger for Gold Rush Services, Corp., assigned to Metro Bank. Maximo suffered a stroke while on duty and died shortly thereafter due to myocardial infarction. His widow, Belinda, sought death benefits from the Social Security System (SSS), claiming that his job contributed to his untimely death. The journey through the legal system, from the initial denial by the SSS to the eventual Supreme Court ruling, highlights the intricate balance between occupational hazards and health outcomes.

Legal Context: Understanding Compensability of Heart Conditions

In the Philippines, the Employees’ Compensation Law, established under Presidential Decree No. 626, provides a framework for compensating employees who suffer from work-related illnesses or injuries. For cardiovascular diseases like myocardial infarction to be compensable, they must be directly linked to the employee’s work conditions. The ECC Board Resolution No. 11-05-13 outlines specific conditions under which cardiovascular diseases are considered compensable occupational diseases.

Key among these conditions is the requirement that the strain of work must be of sufficient severity and must be followed within 24 hours by clinical signs of a cardiac insult. Additionally, the law stipulates that the employee’s work must involve risks that caused the development of the illness, and the disease must have been contracted as a result of exposure to those risks.

These legal provisions are crucial for understanding how the courts assess the relationship between an employee’s job and their health. For instance, if an employee’s job involves significant physical or emotional stress, and this stress directly leads to a heart attack, the condition may be deemed compensable.

Case Breakdown: The Journey of Maximo Cuento

Maximo Cuento’s story began with his employment as a motorized messenger, a role that required him to navigate the challenging traffic of Metro Manila, delivering documents under the sun and rain. On June 15, 2011, Maximo was diagnosed with a transient ischemic attack, a warning sign of potential heart issues. Despite this, he continued his duties until October 4, 2011, when he suffered a stroke while on duty and was declared dead on arrival at the hospital due to myocardial infarction.

Belinda Cuento’s claim for death benefits was initially denied by the SSS, a decision upheld by the Employees’ Compensation Commission (ECC). However, the Court of Appeals (CA) reversed this decision, finding that Maximo’s job as a messenger exposed him to significant stress and strain, contributing to his heart attack. The Supreme Court, in its ruling, affirmed the CA’s decision, emphasizing the compensability of Maximo’s condition.

The Supreme Court’s reasoning was clear: “The strain of work that brings about an acute attack must be of sufficient severity and must be followed within 24 hours by the clinical signs of a cardiac insult to constitute causal relationship.” This was directly applicable to Maximo’s situation, as he suffered a heart attack while on duty and died within 24 hours.

Furthermore, the Court highlighted the daily exposure to environmental stressors such as heat, rain, and pollution, stating, “Daily exposure to the heat of the sun, rain, and pollution are principal factors that cannot simply be ignored in declaring the compensability of the death of respondent’s husband.”

Practical Implications: What This Means for Employees and Employers

This ruling sets a precedent for how work-related heart conditions are assessed for compensability. Employees working in high-stress environments, particularly those involving physical exertion or exposure to environmental hazards, should be aware of their rights under the Employees’ Compensation Law. Employers, on the other hand, must recognize the potential health risks associated with certain job roles and take steps to mitigate these risks.

Key Lessons:

• Employees should document any health issues related to their work and seek medical attention promptly.
• Employers should conduct regular health assessments and provide a safe working environment to prevent work-related health issues.
• Both parties should be aware of the legal provisions governing compensability and seek legal advice when necessary.

Frequently Asked Questions

What qualifies as a work-related heart condition?
A heart condition is considered work-related if it is directly linked to the strain or stress of the job, as outlined by the ECC Board Resolution No. 11-05-13.

Can I claim compensation for a heart attack if it happens outside of work?
Compensation may still be possible if the heart attack is directly linked to the stress or strain experienced at work, and it occurs within 24 hours of such an event.

What should I do if my claim for compensation is denied?
Appeal the decision to the Employees’ Compensation Commission and, if necessary, seek legal assistance to challenge the denial.

How can employers prevent work-related heart conditions?
Employers should implement health and safety measures, provide regular health check-ups, and reduce workplace stress where possible.

What are the key factors the court considers in determining compensability?
The court looks at the severity of the work strain, the timing of the heart attack in relation to work, and the overall health history of the employee.

ASG Law specializes in employment and labor law. Contact us or email hello@asglawpartners.com to schedule a consultation.